TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Keithsburg & Eastern Railroad v. Henry

Keithsburg and Eastern Railroad Company v. Henry A. Henry

Keithsburg & Eastern R.R. v. Henry, 90 Ill. 255 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1878
Judges
Scott
Citations
90 Ill. 255
Syllabus
1. Pleading and evidence —proof of execution of a bond by a corporation. Where an appeal bond of a railway company is sued on, and there is no plea under oath denying it is the bond of the company, and it purports on its face to be the bond of the company, and is signed by its president and secretary, with the corporate seal attached, no other proof of its being the bond of the company is necessary. 2. Evidence—in suit on appeal bond. In a suit upon an appeal bond given on an appeal to this court, the judgment of affirmance by this court is conclusive as to the validity of the judgment appealed from, and no inquiry can be had as to the merits of the original controversy, nor as to the validity of the judgment.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon, George W. Pleasants, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Scott

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Scott delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was on an appeal bond in the penal sum of $2500, and was subject to a condition thereunder written in which it is recited that on the 28th day of July, 1875, appellee recovered a judgment against the Keithsburg and Eastern Eailroad Company for the sum of $1500 and costs of suit, from which judgment the company had taken an appeal to the Supreme Court, and that if the company should prosecute its appeal with effect, and should pay the judgment, costs, interest and damages in case the judgment was affirmed, then the bond should be void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect. It is proved the judgment was afterwards affirmed in the Supreme Court. There is no plea under oath denying it is the bond of the railroad company. It purports on its face to be the bond of the company, is signed by its president and secretary, with the corporate seal attached, and under the pleadings no other proof was necessary.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is conclusive as to the validity of the judgment appealed from, and no inquiry can be had in this collateral proceeding as to the merits of the original controversy, nor even as to the validity of the judgment itself.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1906: 119062026peak 1906 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McCarthy v. Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Co.76 N.E. 850 (Ill. 1906)

Most recent

  1. McCarthy v. Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Co.76 N.E. 850 (Ill. 1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list