Wilson v. Weber
James H. Wilson, Receiver of the St. Louis and Southeastern Railroad Company v. Herman G. Weber
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam : The main question in this case is determined against the appellant, in the case of Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Co. v. Weber, ante, p. 443.
The only new question presented in this case relates to the distribution among the counties of the share of each for local taxation in the value of the “rolling stock” and of the “ capital stock.”
The statute says that distribution shall be made by the board on the basis of the length of main track in each county. It is not denied that the distribution was correctly made, but it is said the board made no order of distribution, and the secretary of the board made the distribution after the adjournment of the board. The law fixes the basis and rule for the distribution, and the amounts to be distributed were duly ascertained. The computations to make the distribution did not require the exercise of any discretion. The service was merely ministerial, and we can not regard the want of a formal order on that subject as good ground in a court of equity to invalidate the tax. The company owes the amount of the tax claimed, and no injunction should be allowed on account of a mere irregularity by reason of which it is not shown that the burden upon the company has at all been increased. " It may perhaps have been regarded as one of the implied duties of the secretary.
The decree of the court below must be affirmed;
Decree affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.