TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kankakee & Seneca Railroad v. Straut

The Kankakee and Seneca Railroad Company v. George Straut

Kankakee & Seneca R.R. v. Straut, 101 Ill. 653 (1882)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1882
Judges
Walker
Citations
101 Ill. 653
Syllabus
Appeal—/rom county court to Supreme Court—in condemnation proceeding. An appeal will lie directly from the county court to the Supreme Court in a proceeding to condemn land for a right of way for a railroad, under the Eminent Domain act.
Summary
Appeal from the County Court of Grundy county. This was a proceeding in the court below .to condemn land for a right of way for a railroad over the premises of appellee. The railroad company appealed. A motion is now made on behalf of the appellee to dismiss the appeal for the want of jurisdiction in this court, it being insisted the appeal should have been taken to the Appellate Court. Messrs. Doud & Wing, for the motion, contended that the 12th section of the Eminent Domain act, giving an appeal directly from the county court to this court, was repealed by section 67 of the Practice act, (acts 1877, p. 149,) and that this appeal should have been taken to the Appellate Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Walker

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Walker, J.: The 12th section of the Eminent Domain act, in express terms, gives the right of appeal in cases of this character, directly from the trial court to this court. We do not think anything contained in the Practice act should be held to operate as a repeal of that section. The appeal was properly taken from the county court to this court.

Motion denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1882–1883: 11888–1889: 11896–1897: 118822026peak 1882 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list