TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Campbell v. Goddard

M. C. Campbell v. Leroy A. Goddard

Campbell v. Goddard, 14 N.E. 261 (Ill. 1887)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 8, 1887
Citations
14 N.E. 261123 Ill. 220
Syllabus
Judgment by confession—including attorney’s fee, A power of attorney authorizing any attorney-at-law to appear before any court of record, in term time or in vacation, and confess judgment for the amount of a promissory note, and the interest thereon, and for a “reasonable attorney’s' fee,” will not authorize the amount of the attorney’s fee to he fixed by the-attorney himself. The warrant should be' construed as conferring upon-the court the power of determining the reasonableness of the fee.
Summary
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Williamson county; the Hon. David J. Baker, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam : At the May term of the circuit court of Williamson county, 1885, appellants moved the court to vacate or modify a judgment against them, entered by confession upon warrant of attorney before the clerk of said court in vacation. The motion was overruled by the circuit court and judgment rendered against appellants for costs. An appeal was prosecuted to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District, where the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed. The case is brought here by the further appeal of the defendants below.

The judgment was confessed for the sum of $1390.80, being for the amount of a promissory note mentioned in the warrant of attorney, and interest thereon, and an attorney’s fee of $25.

This case is in all essential particulars, except as to parties and amounts, precisely like the case of Campbell et al. v. Goddard, determined by this court, and reported in 117 Ill. 251 . Here, as in that case, the warrant of attorney authorized and empowered any attorney at law to appear in any court of record, in term time or in vacation, and confess judgment for the amount of the note mentioned, and eight per cent interest from maturity thereon,.and “a reasonable attorney’s fee,” etc. The declaration contains no allegation of what would be a reasonable fee. The cognovit filed, includes in the amount for which judgment was confessed, an attorney’s fee of $25, the attorney entering said judgment having fixed the amount of such attorney’s fee, in his discretion. This record therefore presents the same questions determined in the case referred to, and should be decided the same way.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case, the judgments of the Appellate and circuit courts are reversed, and the cause remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Campbell v. Goddard, 7 N.E. 640 (Ill. 1886) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list