TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Danny Alan Vestal v. David L. Murphy, Superintendent, Davidson Correctional Center

Vestal v. Murphy, 68 F.3d 463 (4th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 17, 1995
Docket
No. 95-7161
Citations
68 F.3d 4631995 WL 6078161995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33888
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

68 F.3d 463

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Danny Alan VESTAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David L. MURPHY, Superintendent, Davidson Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7161.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1995. Decided: October 17, 1995.

Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vestal v. Murphy, No. CA-95-413-4 (M.D.N.C. July 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1997: 119972026peak 1997 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt106 F.3d 553 (4th Cir. 1997)

Most recent

  1. Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt106 F.3d 553 (4th Cir. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list