TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Whipple v. People ex rel. Buzzell

James Whipple v. The People ex rel. Nathaniel Buzzell

Whipple v. People ex rel. Buzzell, 54 N.E. 279 (Ill. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 17, 1899
Judges
Craig
Citations
54 N.E. 279180 Ill. 258
Headnotes
Appeals and errors—when appeal must be taken to the Appellate Court. An appeal from a judgment of ouster, rendered in a proceeding in the name of the People to contest the title of the respondent to the office of commissioner of highways, must be taken to the Appellate Court. (People v. Holtz, 92 Ill. 426, and McGrath v. People, 100 id. 464, followed.)
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeKalb county; the Hon. George W. Brown, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Craig

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Craig delivered the opinion of the court:

This was a proceeding instituted in the circuit court of DeKalb county in the name of The People ex rel. Nathaniel Buzzell, against James Whipple, to contest the title of the respondent to the office of commissioner of highways of the township of Sycamore, in DeKalb county. The defendant, James Whipple, pleaded to the information, setting up title to the office. Replications were filed and. a hearing was had before the court on the pleadings and evidence, and the court entered a judgment of ouster. The respondent prayed for and obtained an appeal to this court.

This is not a criminal case, nor one involving a freehold, a franchise or the validity of a statute, and under the Appellate Court act and sections 88 and 90 of the Practice act an appeal from a judgment of ouster will not lie to this court but must be taken to the Appellate Court, as held in People v. Holtz, 92 Ill. 426 , and McGrath v. People, 100 id. 464 . As these cases are conclusive of the question no further discussion is required.

The appeal will be dismissed, but leave will be granted appellant to withdraw the record, abstract and briefs, to be filed in the Appellate Court.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People ex rel. Bardill v. Holtz, 92 Ill. 426 (1879) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list