TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Regneri v. Loesch

Mathilde Regneri v. Frank J. Loesch, Trustee

Regneri v. Loesch, 54 N.E. 932 (Ill. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 16, 1899
Judges
Wilkin
Citations
54 N.E. 932182 Ill. 143
Headnotes
Appeals and errors—when no question of law is presented to Supreme Court. No question of law is presented to the Supreme Court for review in an action of ejectment tried by the court without a jury, where no objection was made to the admission or rejection of evidence, or any exception taken to the overruling of the motion for a new trial, or to the finding, or to the entry of judgment, or any propositions of law submitted.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wilkin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Wilkin delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action of ejectment by appellee, against appellant, begun in the circuit court of Cook county on December 23, 1898. To the declaration appellant filed a plea of not guilty. A jury being waived, the cause was submitted to the court upon evidence, resulting in a judgment in favor of appellee. From that judgment appellant appeals.

The only error assigned by appellant is, that the judgment is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law. No objection was made to the admission or rejection of evidence upon the trial. No exception was taken either to the overruling of the motion for a new trial, nor to the finding, nor to the entry of judgment; nor were any propositions of law submitted, as provided by section 42 of chapter 110 of the Revised Statutes, to be refused or held. In this condition of the record there is no question of law before this court for review, and under the repeated decisions of this court the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. Gould v. Howe, 127 Ill. 251 ; Gage v. Gaudy, 128 id. 566.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Gould v. Howe, 19 N.E. 714 (Ill. 1889) 30

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list