Gage v. People ex rel. Hanberg
Henry H. Gage v. The People ex rel. John J. Hanberg, County Treasurer
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam : This case is in all respects like the case of Gage v. People, (ante, p. 347,) except an additional error is assigned, in that the court entered judgment for costs, only. The opinion in the case of Gage v. People, supra, will accordingly govern, except that the court will also be ordered to enter a judgment for the special assessment applied for, together with costs, etc. Both the errors being upon the entry of the judgment it will not be necessary to award a new trial.
The judgment of the county court will accordingly be reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to that court, upon motion of defendant in error, to enter a judgment in compliance with section 191 of chapter 120, Hurd’s Revised Statutes.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.