Wight v. City of Chicago
James S. Wight, Receiver v. The City of Chicago
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Dunn delivered the opinion of the court:
This case was tried by the court, by agreement, without a jury, upon a stipulation as to the facts. There was no ruling of the court upon the admission or exclusion of evidence and no written propositions to be held as law were submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of the Practice act, therefore no question of law is presented by the record for our consideration. Jacobson v. Liverpool and London and Globe Ins. Co. 231 Ill. 61 ; Swain v. First Nat. Bank, 201 id. 416; Grabbs v. City of Danville, 166 id. 441; Bolton v. Johnston, 163 id. 234.
The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.