TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Public Service Co. v. Martin

The Public Service Company of Northern Illinois v. Albert J. Martin

Pub. Serv. Co. v. Martin, 126 N.E. 220 (Ill. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 18, 1920
Docket
No. 12982
Judges
Duncan
Citations
126 N.E. 220291 Ill. 471
Disposition
Judgment affirmed.)
Summary
Appeal from, the County Court of Lake county; the Hon. Perry L. Persons, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Duncan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Duncan delivered the opinion of the court:

The Public Service Company of Northern Illinois, appellee, filed a petition in the county court of Lake county to condemn certain lands required for the extension of its transmission line. Appellants, with others, as owners of certain tracts of land described in 'the petition and sought to be condemned, were made, defendants. All of the defendants, including appellants, filed joint and several motions to dismiss the petition, limiting their appearance for that special purpose. These motions were denied. All of the defendants, including appellants, then entered their general appearance and filed, cross-petitions alleging damages to lands not taken. On trials had, judgments of condemnation and fixing compensation for lands taken were rendered against all of said defendants. Appellants have prosecuted this separate appeal from the judgment rendered against them.

The grounds relied upon for a reversal of the judgment by appellants are that appellee had no right to exercise the right of eminent domain, and that sections 50 and 59 of the act providing for the regulation of public utilities are void because in contravention of section 13 of article 4 of the constitution. The same questions were raised by the appeal and assignments of error in Public Service Co. v. Recktenwald, 290 Ill. 314 , and the briefs and arguments in that case are identical with the briefs and arguments in this case. The decision in that case is decisive of the questions raised in this case,' and for the reasons therein given the judgment of the county court in this case is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reell ex rel. Haskin v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co.45 N.E.2d 500 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Reell ex rel. Haskin v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co.45 N.E.2d 500 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Pub. Serv. Co. v. Recktenwald, 125 N.E. 271 (Ill. 1919) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list