People v. Hannon
The People of the State of Illinois, in Error v. James Hannon, in Error
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff in error was indicted in the criminal court of Cook county, tried and found guilty by a jury of the crime of grand larceny. No bill of exceptions has been preserved as to . rulings on matters arising on the trial, but plaintiff in error brings the common law record here and insists that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed for the reason that the jury should have fixed the term of imprison- . ment and that the Parole act of 1917 is unconstitutional. These questions were passed upon adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error in the case of People v. Doras, 290. Ill. 188, and People v. Connors, (post, p. 614,) and all of the proper argument here presented was there considered. The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.