TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. Hill

The Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad Company v. Sanford Hill

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis R.R. v. Hill, 29 Ill. App. 582 (1889)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 10, 1889
Judges
Reeves
Citations
29 Ill. App. 5821888 Ill. App. LEXIS 186
Headnotes
Railroads—Negligence—Failure to Signal—Killing Cow at Crossing-Pleading—Improper Amendment—Duplieity. 1. Two distinct causes of action can not be set up in a single count of the declaration. 2. In an action against a railroad company to recover damages for killing a cow at a crossing, this court reverses the judgment for the plaintiff for error of the court below in overruling the demurrer to the amended declaration which set up both a statutory and a common law cause of action.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson County; the Hon. C. C. Boggs, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Reeves

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Reeves, J. This action was to recover the value of a cow, alleged to have been killed by a train of appellant at a road crossing, just west of Mt. Vernon. The declaration charged negligence in not performing a statutory duty to ring a bell or blow a whistle before crossing the public highway.

By leave of the trial court appellee filed what he denominated an amendment to his original declaration, which, after stating facts which rendered the crossing a dangerous one, charged that the appellant ran its train over said crossing at a high rate of speed, and in a careless and reckless manner. This amendment attempted to make a case of common law negligence. Appellant interposed a demurrer, both general and special, to the declaration as amended, and among other-grounds, alleged that there was an attempt in the declaration to set up in one count two distinct causes of action, one arising from statutory and the other from common law negligence.

The court below overruled the demurrer, and appellant standing by its demurrer, there was judgment for appellee.

We think the court erred in its ruling upon this demurrer. It seems to us clear that the declaration as amended was open to .demurrer upon the ground that in one count it attempted to set up' two distinct causes of action; this should have been done by two counts.

For this error the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1897: 11921: 118972026peak 1897 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. S. S. Sleeper & Co. v. World's Fair Banquet Hall Co.166 Ill. 57 (1897)
  2. City of Detroit v. Wabash Refining Co.223 Ill. App. 246 (1921)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list