Bogue-Badenoch Co. v. Boyden
The Bogue-Badenoch Company v. Noel B. Boyden, for use, etc.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Gary, J. This is a suit upon a replevin hond by the late coroner of Cook county, for the use of the judgment creditors upon whose execution the property was in the hands of the sheriff, at the time it was replevied by the appellants. The merits were not tried in the replevin suit, and were, therefore, open to inquiry in this. The record has been examined by the court and there is no error in it.
It is unnecessary to go through the various objections made by appellants’ brief. "Mo errors are assigned upon the record or attached thereto in accordance with rule 15. A loose paper, unsigned, unentitled either as to case or court, with no file mark upon it, is found among the printed matter which came to the hands of one of the judges when the case was being examined in conference, which says some judgment is wrong, but it is mere conjecture that it has anything to do with this case. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.