Lyons v. Crawford
Phillip Jackson LYONS v. Jackie CRAWFORD
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ORDER
The opinion filed November 13, 2000 [ 232 F.3d 666 ], is hereby ordered amended as follows:
Slip Op. at 14430: Delete “AFFIRMED” and add the following new paragraphs to the end of the opinion:
“Nevertheless, because Lyons’s habe-as petition included a number of exhausted claims which the district court dismissed without prejudice at Lyons’s request, we remand this action to the district court to provide Lyons with the opportunity to proceed on such exhausted claims only.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.”
Except as herein modified, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judge Gould and Judge O’Scannlain have voted to reject the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and Judge Leavy so recommends.
The full court was advised of the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc. A judge of this court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of *905 the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration.
The Petition and the Suggestion are thus DENIED.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that a petitioner may “make the federal basis of [a] claim explicit either by citing federal law or the decisions of federal courts”)
-
(refusing to decide claims that a party raised below, but did not address in the party’s brief to the Alaska Supreme Court)
-
(“[A] petitioner for 22 habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 exhausts available state remedies 23 only if he characterized the claims he raised in state proceedings specifically as 24 federal claims.”)
Cited by 179 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.