George F. Harding & Firemen's Insurance v. Kuessner
George F. Harding and Firemen's Insurance Co. v. Ferdinand Kuessner, for Use, etc.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Waterman delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an action brought upon a bond given upon an appeal to this court from a judgment rendered against the insurance company.
Upon such appeal, in this court, the plaintiff remitted the sum of $390.28, and "the judgment of the Superior Court was affirmed for $1,072.22. Appellants contend that as the judgment of the Superior Court was not affirmed in toto, and as the Firemen’s Insurance Company has taken an appeal from the judgment of this court, there has been no breach of the condition of its bond.
It does not appear from the record in this cause, here filed, that an appeal has been taken from the judgment of this court affirming the judgment of the Superior Court, upon appeal from which the bond was given. It was not necessary to aver or prove that no appeal had been taken. 2 Chitty’s Pleading, 484n.
The affirmance by this court of the judgment of the Superior Court for $1,072.22, and the failure to pay the same, constituted a breach of the condition of the bond.
The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.