TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lauretta Lorraine Mintzmyer v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior

Lauretta Lorraine Mintzmyer v. Babbitt, 72 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 18, 1995
Docket
No. 95-5041
Citations
72 F.3d 920315 U.S. App. D.C. 2811995 WL 7619111995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40493
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

72 F.3d 920 315 U.S.App.D.C. 281

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Lauretta Lorraine MINTZMYER, Appellant, v. Bruce BABBITT, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Appellee.

No. 95-5041.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1995.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, BUCKLEY and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This cause came to be heard on the appeal from the judgment for defendant-appellee Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior in the District Court, and was briefed and argued by counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). Because the District Court's conclusion that the evidence did not support a finding of constructive discharge on grounds of sex or age discrimination was neither clearly erroneous nor incorrect as a matter of law, it is 2

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the court, that the judgment is affirmed.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1996: 12007: 12008: 119962026peak 1996 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reshard v. Peters579 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D.D.C. 2008)
  2. McNally v. Norton498 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D.D.C. 2007)
  3. Kwatowski v. Runyon917 F. Supp. 877 (D. Mass. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Reshard v. Peters579 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D.D.C. 2008)
  2. McNally v. Norton498 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D.D.C. 2007)
  3. Kwatowski v. Runyon917 F. Supp. 877 (D. Mass. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list