TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Johnson v. Sheriff of Cook County

The People ex rel. Thomas Johnson v. Sheriff of Cook County

People ex rel. Johnson v. Sheriff of Cook Cnty., 282 N.E.2d 776 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 7, 1972
Docket
No. 56594
Judges
Drucker
Citations
282 N.E.2d 7764 Ill. App. 3d 10011972 Ill. App. LEXIS 1773

Opinion of the Court — Drucker

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. JUSTICE DRUCKER delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal, transferred from the Supreme Court, is from the dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

On May 21, 1970, petitioner filed a pro se petition alleging that his conviction, after a plea of guilty, on a reduced charge of deceptive practices, was void since he was neither represented by counsel nor advised of his right to counsel on the date that he entered his plea of guilty; that he was thereby deprived of his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the law and should be discharged from custody.

The public defender was appointed to represent petitioner in regard to the instant petition, and after a hearing on the State’s motion to dismiss, the petitioner’s request for a writ of habeas corpus was denied and the petition dismissed. This appeal followed.

In People ex rel. Lewis v. Frye, 42 Ill.2d 58, 60 , 245 N.E.2d 483, 484 , it was held that:

“The remedy of habeas corpus is not available to review errors of a nonjurisdictional nature, though they involve claims of denial of constitutional rights. 000 While the trial court could have treated the petition here as a petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act and disregarded its designation as one for a writ of habeas corpus, it was not required to do so.”

The order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

LORENZ, P. J., and ENGLISH, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 119732026peak 1973 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Warr298 N.E.2d 164 (Ill. 1973)

Most recent

  1. People v. Warr298 N.E.2d 164 (Ill. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People ex rel. Lewis v. Frye, 245 N.E.2d 483 (Ill. 1969) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list