TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, Inc.

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellants

Princeton Univ. Press v. Mich. Document Servs., Inc., 74 F.3d 1528 (6th Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 9, 1996
Docket
No. 94-1778
Judges
Merritt, Kennedy, Martin, Milburn, Nelson, Ryan, Boggs, Norris, Suhrheinrich, Siler, Batchelder, Daughtrey, Moore, Cole
Citations
74 F.3d 15281996 WL 1716061996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7474

Opinion

ORDER A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Resser v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 74 F.3d 1528 (7th Cir. 1996) 40

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list