TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States

KAMILCHE COMPANY; Simpson Redwood Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

Kamilche Co. Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States, 75 F.3d 1391 (9th Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 5, 1996
Docket
No. 93-15768
Judges
Goodwin, O'Scannlain, Kle, Infeld
Citations
75 F.3d 139196 Daily Journal DAR 124077 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 8161996 WL 4994296 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8001996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517

Opinion

ORDER The opinion cited at 53 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir.1995), is hereby amended as follows:

At 53 F.3d 1064 , before the word “REVERSED,” the following paragraph is added:

In its petition for rehearing, the government reminds us that Simpson received a benefit in the amount of $300,000.00 as part of the transaction in which it dis-. claimed its interest and contests whether donative intent has been established to that extent. If the fair market value of the donated property exceeds the value of the property received in return, the taxpayer has the requisite donative intent for the excess value. conveyed.

United States v. American Bar Endowment, 477 U.S. 105, 118 , 106 S.Ct. 2426, 2433-34 , 91 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). Simpson concedes, and we so hold, that its tax deduction must be reduced to that extent, i.e. to $13,800,000.00, based on the stipulated record.

Except as granted to the above extent, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1999: 12001: 12002: 12014: 12015: 12023: 119992026peak 1999 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Resolution Trust Corporation v. Charles H186 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 1999)
  2. Pool Water Products v. Olin Corporation258 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2001)
  3. United States v. Maricopa151 F. Supp. 3d 998 (D. Ariz. 2015)
  4. Alberto-Culver Co. v. Trevive, Inc.199 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (C.D. Cal. 2002)
  5. Dunkle v. Dale58 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D. Alaska 2014)
  6. Kleidman v. MurphyNo. 4:22-cv-06355 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2023)

Most recent

  1. Kleidman v. MurphyNo. 4:22-cv-06355 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2023)
  2. United States v. Maricopa151 F. Supp. 3d 998 (D. Ariz. 2015)
  3. Dunkle v. Dale58 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D. Alaska 2014)
  4. Alberto-Culver Co. v. Trevive, Inc.199 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (C.D. Cal. 2002)
  5. Pool Water Products v. Olin Corporation258 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2001)
  6. Resolution Trust Corporation v. Charles H186 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Am. Bar Endowment, 477 U.S. 105 (1986) 162
Kamilche Co. Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States, 53 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 1995) 32

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list