TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Peck v. Braman

Peck and Others v. Braman and Others, in Error

Peck v. Braman, 2 Blackf. 141 (1828)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 7, 1828
Citations
2 Blackf. 1411828 Ind. LEXIS 11

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

AN infant, after his guardian’s death, has a right to compel a settlement of Ms accounts as if he were of age; the guardian’s trust being personal, and terminating at his death. Bac. Abr. tit. Guardian.

In the case of a guardianship until the ward is of full age, the general rule is, that the ward must be of age before he can require his guardian to account; yet, in chancery, a ward may, during his minority, call such a guardian to account, if any thing should occur which makes it necessary. Ib.

The guardianship of minors, and the adjustment of their accounts, form a conspicuous branch of chancery jurisdiction. Ib.—2 Fonb. Eq. 225—251.—Beaufort v. Berty, 1 Peere Wms. 702.—1 Bl. Comm. 463.

The extension of the jurisdiction of Courts of law, in modern *142 times, to cases which were formerly subjects of equitable jurisdiction only, has not destroyed the jurisdiction of Courts of equity. Kemp v. Pryor, 7 Ves. 249.

When accounts are intricate and difficult, a bill in equity is ihe more usual and suitable proceeding to compel an account; being best calculated to do justice between the parties; since the plaintiff can thereby obtain a discovery of books and papers, and have the benefit of the defendant’s oath; who, on the other hand, is entitled to all both legal and equitable allowances. Paley on Agency, 57.

The heirs of A., some of whbm were infants, and his represeqtatives, filed a bill in chancery against the heirs and representatives of B. The bill stated that B., the guardian of A.'s heirs, having contracted to sell their land to C., procured an order of the Court in Conneclicul, where the land was situated, authorising its sale by D.: that D., pursuant to the order, sold and conveyed the land to C. for 1,500 dollars, which amount had nearly all been received by B.: that bonds to the Court were executed by D. and É., conditioned that B. should vest the purchase-money hr other land for the heirs of A., or lay it out for their nurture, education, or advancement, and should account to the Court when required, or to the heirs when they should come of age: that B. having married the widow and administratrix of A., became possessed of the intestate’s personal estate to a considerable amount: that B. afterwards removed from Connecticut to Indiana, purchased land here with the money of Ais h.eirs received as aforesaid, took the title in his own name, and died without accounting to them,' Or leaving personal property sufficient to pay their claim. The bill prayed for a discovery, relief, &c.

Held, that a demurrer to the bill, on the ground of the complainant’s remedy being at law, could not be sustained; the' case being within the jurisdiction of a Court of chancery.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1842–1843: 11846–1847: 11858–1859: 11860–1861: 11866–1867: 11884–1885: 118422026peak 1842 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Allgier3 P. 849 (Cal. 1884)
  2. M'Cord v. Ochiltree8 Blackf. 15 (1846)
  3. Carhart v. Auburn Gas Light Co.22 Barb. 297 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1866)
  4. Ely v. Hawkins15 Ind. 230 (1860)
  5. City of New Orleans v. Costello14 La. Ann. 37 (1859)
  6. Wagner v. Kenner2 Rob. 120 (1842) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. In re Allgier3 P. 849 (Cal. 1884)
  2. Carhart v. Auburn Gas Light Co.22 Barb. 297 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1866)
  3. Ely v. Hawkins15 Ind. 230 (1860)
  4. City of New Orleans v. Costello14 La. Ann. 37 (1859)
  5. M'Cord v. Ochiltree8 Blackf. 15 (1846)
  6. Wagner v. Kenner2 Rob. 120 (1842) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list