TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Herndon

State v. Herndon, 5 Blackf. 75 (1839)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 20, 1839
Judges
Dewey
Citations
5 Blackf. 751839 Ind. LEXIS 8
Headnotes
A person selected as a talesman to serve on a grand jury, must be either a freeholder or householder. If a grand juror have not all the qualifications required by the statute, it is a good cause of challenge ; or the defendant, before issue joined, may plead the objection in avoidance.
Summary
ERROR to the Montgomery Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Dewey

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Dewey, J.

Indictment for assault and battery. The defendant pleaded in abatement that one of the grand jurors who preferred the bill, and who had been selected as a talesman, was not a householder or freeholder. The state demurred; the demurrer was overruled, and the defendant discharged.

The Circuit Court was correct in sustaining the plea. The statute regulating the mode of summoning grand and *76 petit jurors, requires that the jurors be selected from the list of taxable persons, and that they be good reputable freeholders or householders of the proper county. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 291. A talesman is such a person as is qualified to be on the original panel.

TY. Quarles, for the state. T. J. Evans, for the defendant.

If a grand juror lack any of the qualifications required by the statute, it is a good cause of challenge ; or the defendant, before issue joined, may plead the objection in avoidance. Va ttier v. The State. 4 Blackf. 73 .—1 Chitt. C. L. 308.—Bac. Abr. tit. Juries A.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1855–1856: 21859–1860: 11863–1864: 11871–1872: 11873–1874: 21875–1876: 11903–1904: 11917–1918: 11941–1942: 118552026peak 1855 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Crowley v. United States194 U.S. 461 (1904)
  2. Hardin v. State22 Ind. 347 (1864)
  3. Shattuck v. State11 Ind. 473 (1859)
  4. Ward v. State48 Ind. 289 (1874)
  5. Bell v. State42 Ind. 335 (1873)
  6. Anderson v. State32 N.E.2d 705 (Ind. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Anderson v. State32 N.E.2d 705 (Ind. 1941)
  2. Stipp v. State118 N.E. 818 (Ind. 1918)
  3. Crowley v. United States194 U.S. 461 (1904)
  4. State v. Easter30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 542 (1876)
  5. Ward v. State48 Ind. 289 (1874)
  6. Bell v. State42 Ind. 335 (1873)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Vattier v. State, 4 Blackf. 73 (1835) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list