TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley

Chapman v. The State, on the Relation of Conerley

Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley, 5 Blackf. 111 (1839)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 24, 1839
Judges
Blackford
Citations
5 Blackf. 1111839 Ind. LEXIS 35
Headnotes
A trial of a caso of bastardy on Sunday, by a justice of the peace, is void.
Summary
ERROR to the Lawrence Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Blackford

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Blackford, J.

A justice of the peace, on the 27th of January, 1838, issued a warrant against Chapman in a case of bastardy. On the next day, which was Sunday, the warrant was returned, the defendant brought before the justice, the cause tried, and the defendant adjudged to be the father of the child, &c.

G. G. Dunn, for the plaintiff. J. W. Payne and R. W. Thompson, for the defendant.

The cause was certified to the Circuit, Court.

Upon the calling of the cause in the Circuit Court, the defendant moved to dismiss the suit, on the ground that the trial before the justice took place on a Sunday. The motion was overruled, the cause tried, and a verdict and judgment rendered against the defendant.

The question presented by this record is, Could the justice examine' and decide the cause on a Sunday ? Our answer is, that he could not. Sunday is dies non juridicus; and, by the common law, all judicial proceedings which take place on that day are void. Swann v. Broome, 3 Burr. 1595. —Pearce v. Atwood, 13 Mass. 324. —Arthur v. Mosby, 2 Bibb, 589 . Our statute has made some exceptions to this rule, but they do not apply to the case before us.

The motion made in the Circuit Court to dismiss the suit should have been sustained.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the motion to dismiss the .suit -set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1846–1847: 11866–1867: 11880–1881: 11886–1887: 11888–1889: 11892–1893: 21894–1895: 11896–1897: 11922–1923: 118462026peak 1892 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stone v. United States64 F. 667 (9th Cir. 1894)
  2. Devault v. Sampson221 P. 284 (Kan. 1923)
  3. Ex parte Tice49 P. 1038 (Or. 1897)
  4. Hodge v. State29 Fla. 500 (1892)
  5. Fox v. Nachtsheim29 P. 140 (Wash. 1892)
  6. Hauswirth v. Sullivan6 Mont. 203 (1886)

Most recent

  1. Devault v. Sampson221 P. 284 (Kan. 1923)
  2. Ex parte Tice49 P. 1038 (Or. 1897)
  3. Stone v. United States64 F. 667 (9th Cir. 1894)
  4. Fox v. Nachtsheim29 P. 140 (Wash. 1892)
  5. Hodge v. State29 Fla. 500 (1892)
  6. City of Parsons v. Lindsay41 Kan. 336 (1889)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Pearce v. Atwood, 13 Mass. 324 (1816) 79

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list