TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Finch v. State

Finch v. State, 6 Blackf. 533 (1843)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 15, 1843
Judges
Blackeord
Citations
6 Blackf. 533
Headnotes
Indictment.—The day and year when an offense is charged in an indictment to have been committed, should he expressed in the indictment in words at length and not in figures, (a) Same.—Indictments are not within the operation of the statutes of amendment.
Summary
ERROR to the Union Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Blackeord

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Blackeord, J.

Indictment against Finch for knowingly-suffering his horse to be run in a horse race along a public highway. Plea, not guilty, and judgment for the State.

The indictment in this case is defective, as the day of the month and the year when the offense is alleged to have been committed, are expressed in figures and not in words at length. This seems to be a slight objection, but the law on the subject is believed to be settled. 1 Chitt. Crim Law, 176. Indictments are not within the operation of the statutes of amendments. Id., 297.

Per Ouriam.—The judgment is reversed. To be certified, &c.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1848–1849: 11852–1853: 21856–1857: 118482026peak 1852 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hampton v. State8 Ind. 336 (1856)
  2. State v. Voshall4 Ind. 589 (1853)
  3. State v. Reed35 Me. 489 (1853)
  4. State v. Seamons1 Greene 418 (1848)

Most recent

  1. Hampton v. State8 Ind. 336 (1856)
  2. State v. Voshall4 Ind. 589 (1853)
  3. State v. Reed35 Me. 489 (1853)
  4. State v. Seamons1 Greene 418 (1848)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list