TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

President of Fort Wayne v. Jackson

The President and Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne, for the Use, &c. v. Jackson and Others

President of Fort Wayne v. Jackson, 7 Blackf. 36 (1844)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 4, 1844
Judges
Dewey
Citations
7 Blackf. 361844 Ind. LEXIS 7
Headnotes
A bond sued on was described in the declaration as payable to “ The President and Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne. ” The bond shown on oyer was payable to “The President and Trustees of the Fort Wayne corporation.” Held, that the variance was fatal. A corporation suing in its true name, on a bond executed to it by a wrong name, should aver in the declaration that the defendant bound himself to the plaintiff by the name contained in the bond. The corporation of “ The President and Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne,” is merged in the corporation of “The City of Fort Wayne;” a bond executed to the former corporation is transferred to and vested in the latter; and a suit on such bond should be brought in the name of “ The City of Fort Wayne,’’'1 ’
Summary
ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Dewey

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Dewey, J.

— This was an action of debt commenced by The President and, Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne against Wick, Lewis, Jackson, and Brackenridge.. The action was founded on a bond executed by Wick and Lewis, as auctioneers within the corporation of the town of Fort Wayne, and by Jackson and Brackenridge as their sureties. The bond, as described in the declaration, was in the penalty of 1,000 dollars, paj^able to The President and Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne, and conditioned for the faithful performance, by Wick and Lewis, of their ditties as auctioneers. The breach assigned was their failure to pay to M'-Qjuaed, on demand, a sum of money they had received in their official character for goods, sold by them, belonging to him. A return of not found as to Wick was suggested. The other defendants craved oyer of the bond and demurred generally. The bond given in oyer was in the penalty of 1,000 dollars, and was payable to The President and Trustees of the Fort Wayné corporation. The Court sustained the demurrer, and rendered final judgment for the defendants.

This decision was correct. There was a variance between the bond declared on, and that given in oyer, in the name of the corporation. The true name of the corporation of Fort Wayne was, under the statute respecting the incorporation of towns, The President and Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne. By that name the plaintiffs sued ; and had they been entitled to sue at all, they should have averred in the declaration that the defendants were bound to them by the name in the bond, to wit, The President and Trustees of the Fort Wayne corporation. Madison Insurance Company v. Stangle, 6 Blackf. 88 .

But we are of opinion that there is no such corporation as that, in the name of which the suit was brought. The statute, under which that corporation once existed, contains an express reservation in the legislature of the right to repeal the act, or to dissolve the corporation. The act to incorporate The City of Fort Wayne is declared to be a public statute, and we are bound to notice it without its being pleaded. *38 The forty-third and forty-fourth sections merge the old corpo- . ration of The President and Trustees of the Town of Fort Wayne in the new one of The City of Fort Wayne; and the forty-third section transfers to, and vests in, the latter, all books, papers, moneys, property, and effects which belonged to the former. Local Laws of 1840, p. 16. This provision transferred the bond on which this suit was founded to The City of Fort Wayne, in which name the suit should have been brought.

PL. Cooper, for the plaintiffs. C. W. Ewing and R. Brachenridge, for the defendants.

Per Curiam.

— The judgment is affirmed with costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1858–1859: 11862–1863: 11874–1875: 11880–1881: 118582026peak 1858 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Madison Ins. v. Stangle, 6 Blackf. 88 (1841) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list