TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Townsend v. Doe ex dem. Chapin

Townsend and Others v. Doe, on the Demise of Chapin and Others.—In error

Townsend v. Doe ex dem. Chapin, 8 Blackf. 328 (1847)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 21, 1847
Citations
8 Blackf. 3281847 Ind. LEXIS 11

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

AFTER the testimony in this case was closed, the defendants moved that every instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof to the jury, should be in writing, and objected *329 to any instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof being given, unless the same should be written. Held, that the Court, by afterwards giving, at the plaintiff’s request, instructions to the jury with verbal explanations and illustrations, committed an error. Stat. 1839, ,p. 37.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1849–1850: 11861–1862: 11875–1876: 21879–1880: 11883–1884: 11887–1888: 11899–1900: 11901–1902: 11925–1926: 118492026peak 1875 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Potter15 Kan. 302 (1875)
  2. Stephenson v. State11 N.E. 360 (Ind. 1887)
  3. Bradway v. Waddell95 Ind. 170 (1884)
  4. Boggs v. United States65 P. 927 (Okla. 1900) · Dissent
  5. City of Atchison v. Jansen21 Kan. 560 (1879)
  6. Boggs v. United States1901 OK 27, 65 P. 927 · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Cutler v. Davidson146 N.E. 584 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925)
  2. Boggs v. United States1901 OK 27, 65 P. 927 · Dissent
  3. Boggs v. United States65 P. 927 (Okla. 1900) · Dissent
  4. Stephenson v. State11 N.E. 360 (Ind. 1887)
  5. Bradway v. Waddell95 Ind. 170 (1884)
  6. City of Atchison v. Jansen21 Kan. 560 (1879)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list