Rhode v. Davis
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Perkins, J.
Davis sued Rhode in an action of trespass quare clausum fregit. Rhode defended on the ground that the locus in quo was a public highway, and that he was acting as supervisor in working the same; and, to sustain his defence, gave in evidence a transcript of certain proceedings had before the county commissioners, ordering said highway to be opened. The transcript did not show that the notice of the application for the highway, required by statute to be given, or that any notice of the proceeding to lay out and establish the same, was given, and there was no proof, aliundi, of the fact. The Court held the proceedings a nullity. We regard the board of county commissioners as a Court of special and limited jurisdiction, whose records must show, to make them evidence of the validity of the acts of the Court, that the requisitions of the statutes under which the Court acted were strictly complied with, so far as was necessary to give jurisdiction. See Corwin v. Merritt, 3d Barbour’s (N. Y.) Sup. C. R. 341, and cases cited.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.