TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McCullough v. Robinson

McCullough v. Robinson and Another.—On Appeal

McCullough v. Robinson, 2 Ind. 630 (1851)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1851
Citations
2 Ind. 630

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

THIS suit was brought by the appellees for 20 dollars as a lawyer’s fee. The appellant had sued his wife for a divorce, but the suit was dismissed. The appellees were attorneys for the wife in the said suit; and they now sued the husband for their services on that occasion..

The appellant had made no promise on the subject to the appellees, except such as might be implied from the said facts. Judgment below against the appellant.

It appears to us that the husband was not liable, in this case, to the claim of the appellees.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c. Costs here.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1867–1868: 11873–1874: 11883–1884: 11885–1886: 21891–1892: 11897–1898: 21907–1908: 21915–1916: 21923–1924: 118672026peak 1885 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Naumer v. Gray28 A.D. 529 (1898)
  2. Porter v. Briggs38 Iowa 166 (1874)
  3. Clarke v. Burke27 N.W. 22 (Wis. 1886)
  4. Peck v. Marling's Adm'r.22 W. Va. 708 (1883)
  5. Kincheloe v. Merriman16 S.W. 578 (Ark. 1891)
  6. Zent v. Sullivan91 P. 1088 (Wash. 1907)

Most recent

  1. Rogers v. Daniel1923 OK 588, 217 P. 881
  2. Fites v. Fites112 N.E. 39 (Ind. Ct. App. 1916)
  3. Wick v. Beck171 Iowa 115 (1915)
  4. Sears v. Swenson115 N.W. 519 (S.D. 1908)
  5. Zent v. Sullivan91 P. 1088 (Wash. 1907)
  6. Naumer v. Gray28 A.D. 529 (1898)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list