TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McNaughtin v. Lamb

McNaughtin and Others v. Lamb

McNaughtin v. Lamb, 2 Ind. 642 (1851)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1851
Judges
Perkins
Citations
2 Ind. 642
Headnotes
Bill in chancery against heirs to set aside a conveyance of land made by a deceased debtor in his lifetime for fraud, and for a sale of the land for the payment of debts. Sale decreed, and sheriff ordered to bring so much of the proceeds as would pay the decree in the case into Court, and to pay the overplus to the defendants. Held, that the decree for the sale was correct, but that the entire proceeds of the sale in such case should be paid into Court to be distributed among creditors, should there be such, in the course of administration.
Summary
ERROR to the Crawford Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Perkins

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Perkins, J.

Bill in chancery against heirs to set aside a conveyance of land, made by a deceased debtor in his lifetime, for fraud, and for a sale of said land for the payment of debts. Sale decreed, and the sheriff ordered to bring so much of the proceeds as would pay the decree in the case into Court, and to pay the overplus to the defendants.

This case is precisely that of O'Brien v. Coulter, 2 Blackf. 421 , and a decree for the sale of the land was rightly made. But Barton et al. v. Bryant et al. in this Court, May term, 1850, (1) shows that the proceeds of said sale, even to the amount of the decree, would not necessarily go to the plaintiffs in the bill, and that the over-plus would not necessarily go to the defendants in the decree; but that the entire proceeds of the sale should be paid into Court to be distributed amongst creditors, should there be such, in the course of administration.

Per Curiam,

—The decree for the sale of the whole land is affirmed with costs; the balance of the decree is reversed, and ordered to be so modified as to direct the sheriff to pay the whole of the proceeds of the sale beyond costs into Court.

See ante, p. 189.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1863–1864: 11871–1872: 11875–1876: 11877–1878: 11881–1882: 11883–1884: 118632026peak 1863 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vestal v. Allen94 Ind. 268 (1884)
  2. Garner v. Graves54 Ind. 188 (1876)
  3. Wilson v. Davis37 Ind. 141 (1871)
  4. Allen v. Vestal60 Ind. 245 (1877)
  5. Carr v. Huette73 Ind. 378 (1881)
  6. Tyler v. Wilkerson20 Ind. 473 (1863)

Most recent

  1. Vestal v. Allen94 Ind. 268 (1884)
  2. Carr v. Huette73 Ind. 378 (1881)
  3. Allen v. Vestal60 Ind. 245 (1877)
  4. Garner v. Graves54 Ind. 188 (1876)
  5. Wilson v. Davis37 Ind. 141 (1871)
  6. Tyler v. Wilkerson20 Ind. 473 (1863)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
O'Brien v. Coulter, 2 Blackf. 421 (1831) 32

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list