Addleman v. Erwin
Addleman v. Erwin and Another, Administrators
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Assumpsit by Addleman against Erwin and others, for money paid, &c. Demand denied. Trial by the Court and judgment for the defendants. The trial was in 1854, under the new practice. No evidence offered was rejected, and none given was excepted to.
J. Perry, for the appellant. W. A. Bielde, for the appellees.
A motion for a new trial was made, but not being in writing, it could not be noticed. McKinney v. Springer, ante, p. 453. Another course might have been pursued to get the questions made below before this Court. The party might have required the Court to make a special statement of the facts and the questions of law decided thereon, and then excepted to the decision, and thus prepared the case for this Court. 2 E. S., 115, s. 341. This was not done, and the record presents no question for our consideration.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.