Hunter v. Miller
Hunter and Others v. Miller and Wife
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This was an application for the partition of certain real estate.
The Court, under the 9th section of the statute on the subject of partition, awarded an interlocutory judgment that partition be made, &c., and appointed commissioners to make partition according to the terms of such order, &c.
B. F. Gregory, J. Harper, I Naylor, and J. Wilson, for the appellants. J. R. M. Bryant and R. A. Chandler, for the appellees.
From this interlocutory judgment, an appeal is now attempted to be prosecuted.
The statute permitting appeals from interlocutory orders, does not embrace within its provisions this case. 2 R. S. p. 162, § 576.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.