Hollenbaugh v. State ex rel. Town of Princeton
Hollenbaugh v. The State on the relation of the Town of Princeton.—Two Cases
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This prosecution was instituted under an ordinance declaring the sale of intoxicating liquors, beer, &c., to be a nuisance, forbidding such sale, and prescribing *557 punishment therefor. The defendant was fined the amount r fixed in the ordinance.
S. Judah, for the appellant.
The validity of the ordinance is questioned.
Following the case of Beebe v. The State, 6 Ind. R. 501, we think this question has been already settled.
The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.