McCole v. Wynne
McCole v. Wynne and Others.—Two Cases
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Cwriam.
The appellees, who were the plaintiffs, sued Me Cole on a promissory note, for the payment of 541 dollars. Issues, properly made, were submitted to the Court for trial. Finding for the plaintiff. Each party moved for a new trial, and each motion was overruled. Judgment on the finding of the Gourt. The defendant appeals to this Court, and assigns for error the refusal to *318 grant him a new trial. This being the only error of which the appellant complains, and the evidence given on the trial not being in the record, the judgment must be affirmed; because we have often decided that when the evidence is not made a part of the record, the opinion of. the Court below in overruling a motion for a new trial, will not be reviewed. 8 Ind. R. 470, 499.—11 id. 260.
,D. Moss, for the appellant.
The judgment is affirmed with 6 per cent, damages and costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.