New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily
The New Albany and Salem Railroad Company v. O'Daily and Wife
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Perkins, J.
This was a proceeding for the assessment of damages occasioned by the laying of a track of the New Albany and Salem, Railroad. The track was laid in a public street in the city of Lafayette, in front of O ’Daily’s property. The proceedings for the assessment of damages were under the act of 1852 (2 R. S. p. 193, § 710), and were instituted by O’Daily.
The fee simple in the streets of towns and cities in Indiana, would seem, during the existence of the corporation, to be-in the public. At all events, this Court has decided that taking a street is not talcing an “interest in the land” of the adjoining proprietor. Protzman v. The Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Co., 9 Ind. R. 467.
Yet it is only when such interest is taken, that the act of 1852 authorizes this proceeding for the assessment of damages. Hence, this suit could not be sustained under it. See The Lafayette, &c., Plankroad Co. v. The New Albany, &c., Railroad Co., at this term (1) .
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed with costs.
Cause remanded, &c.
Ante, 90.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.