TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Perdue v. Aldridge

Perdue v. Aldridge, 19 Ind. 290 (1862)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 15, 1862
Citations
19 Ind. 290
Headnotes
A mortgage is a valid security between a mortgagor and mortgagee, without acknowledgement or record, except that, to bind a femme covert, it must be acknowledged by her. In a complaint for foreclosure, by the mortgagee against the mortgagor alone, it is not necessary to aver that the mortgagor has not sold the land, or that the mortgage has been acknowledged or recorded. Variances between instruments sued on, and those offered in evidence, where the defendant will not be prejudiced thereby, may be amended on the trial.
Summary
APPEAL from the Delaware Common Pleas.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

A mortgage is a valid security between the mortgagor and mortgagee, without acknowledgment or record. Neither of these acts is necessarily a part of a mortgage, except as to a femme covert. 1 G. & H., p. 257, notes. She must acknowledge.

Where the suit to foreclose is by the mortgagee against the mortgagor alone, it is not necessary to aver in the complaint that the mortgagor has not conveyed away the land, or that the mortgage has been acknowledged or recorded.

Variances between instruments sued on and those offered in evidence, where the defendant will not be prejudiced thereby, may ,be amended on the trial. 2 G. & H., pp. 104, 114, and notes.

The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1876–1877: 11900–1901: 11916–1917: 11988–1989: 11994–1995: 118762026peak 1876 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Allen v. Hollingshead57 N.E. 917 (Ind. 1900)
  2. In re Dunn109 B.R. 865 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1988)
  3. Greyhound Financial Corp. & Terre Haute v. Rlc, Inc.637 N.E.2d 1325 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
  4. Roode v. State5 Neb. 174 (1876)
  5. Aufderheide v. Heward117 N.E. 212 (Ind. Ct. App. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Greyhound Financial Corp. & Terre Haute v. Rlc, Inc.637 N.E.2d 1325 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. In re Dunn109 B.R. 865 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1988)
  3. Aufderheide v. Heward117 N.E. 212 (Ind. Ct. App. 1917)
  4. Allen v. Hollingshead57 N.E. 917 (Ind. 1900)
  5. Roode v. State5 Neb. 174 (1876)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list