Wilson v. Truelock
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hanna, J.
This was an action of replevin, commenced before a Justice of the Peace, and appealed to the Circuit Court. In the latter Court the cause was, on motion of the defendants, dismissed, “ for want of jurisdiction in the Justice,” and the ruling excepted to, as shown by the clerk’s entry. There was no bill of exceptions; nor is the ground of objection to the ruling shown in any manner, other than as above set forth. It is assumed by the appellant, that the motion was based upon the fact that there was not a. sufficient bond filed at the proper time, and that question alone is, by him, discussed. The appellee insists, that we are not *390 properly informed, by the record, of tbe grounds upon which the motion was predicated.
Mandall Crawford, for the appellant. Jewett and Crowe, for the appellees.
It is the business of the clerk to enter the orders of the Court, and not to make a record of the reasons for such orders. Hasselback v. Sinton, 17 Ind. 545 . The Court makes that record by bill of exceptions, etc. In the absence of such record, the presumption is in favor of the action of the Court.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.