Berry v. Berry
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This was an application for partition of lands. After the Court had found the respective shares of the parties and ordered a partition, an appeal was taken to this Court and dismissed, because prematurely taken. Berry v. Berry, 13 Ind. 446 . The record before us shows that afterwards commissioners were appointed to make partition, who reported that the land was not susceptible of division without injuring the parties, &e. An order was entered and a commissioner appointed to make sale of said lands, from which no appeal was prayed nor bond given. Eor several tdiuns after this was done the only entries appear to have been orders for continuance. The record is now brought here. See Staley et al. v. Dorst, 11 Ind. 367 , which is decisive of this.
The appeal is dismissed ,at costs of appellant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.