TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Anderson v. Meeker

Anderson v. Meeker, 31 Ind. 245 (1869)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1869
Judges
Ray
Citations
31 Ind. 245
Headnotes
¿Pleading.—Consideration.—Suit on a note against the maker. Answer, that the defendant received no consideration for the note. Held, that the answer was had on demurrer.
Summary
APPEAL from the Fountain Common Pleas.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ray

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ray, J.

Suit on note against the appellant. A paragraph of answer was filed, which alleged, “ that defendant received no consideration for said note.” A demurrer was *246 sustained to this paragraph, and the ruling thereon presents the only question for our consideration.

M. M. Milford, for appellant. <7. Buchanan, for appellee.

The issue tendered by the paragraph was personal. If the note, which was executed by appellant, had a consideration to support it, that was sufficient, whether received by the appellant or some one else with his consent.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs,

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1885–1886: 11893–1894: 11897–1898: 11899–1900: 11921–1922: 11993–1994: 118852026peak 1885 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Moyer v. Brand26 N.E. 125 (Ind. 1885)
  2. Sponhaur v. Malloy52 N.E. 245 (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
  3. Spielman v. Herskovitz134 N.E. 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922)
  4. Nikou v. INB National Bank638 N.E.2d 448 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
  5. Wheeler v. Barr34 N.E. 591 (Ind. Ct. App. 1893)
  6. Dalrymple v. Wyker60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 108 (1899)

Most recent

  1. Nikou v. INB National Bank638 N.E.2d 448 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. Spielman v. Herskovitz134 N.E. 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922)
  3. Dalrymple v. Wyker60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 108 (1899)
  4. Sponhaur v. Malloy52 N.E. 245 (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
  5. Wheeler v. Barr34 N.E. 591 (Ind. Ct. App. 1893)
  6. Moyer v. Brand26 N.E. 125 (Ind. 1885)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list