Miller v. Remley
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Downey, C. J.
This was an action by the appellee against the appellant to foreclose a mortgage' to secure the páyment of four notes, when they should become due. The language is “ to secure the payment, when they shall become due, of four promissory notes, bearing evén date herewith,” &c.
It is insisted by the appellant that there could be no foreclosure of the mortgage until all the notes were due, and that as only two of the notes were due when the suit" was brought, the action was prematurely brought. This is the only point. This exact question was decided by this court, against the position of the appellant, in Hunt v. Harding, 11 Ind. 245 .
The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.