Miller v. State ex rel. Bonnell
Miller v. The State, ex rel. Bonnell
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Worden, J.
Prosecution for bastardy. Trial, verdict and judgment against the defendant.
The ease is before us on the evidence, the only question being whether it was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
The testimony of the relatrix, taken by itself, was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. But in some respects she was contradicted. There was much conflict in the evidence. Indeed, it may be said to be doubtful whether the relatrix really knew who was the father of her child. But the case is not one that justifies us in disturbing the verdict.
The judgment below is affirmed, with' costs
Note. — Opinion filed at May term, 1880, but omitted by mistake.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.