Elbert v. Hoby
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Woods, J.
— We are ashed to reverse the judgment in this case solely on the alleged misconduct of jurors, but the affidavits concerning that misconduct are not made a part of the' record by a bill of exceptions, or by an order of the court. There is therefore no question properly presented for our decision. See McDaniel v. Mattingly, 72 Ind. 349 , ■and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.