Moran v. State ex rel. Walker
Moran v. The State, ex rel. Walker
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Niblack, C. J.
— The State, on the relation of Emily Walker, made complaint before a justice of the peace against Samuel Moran for bastardy, alleging that the said Emily was pregnant with a child which, if born alive, would be a bastard, and that the said Moran was the father of said child. The justice, upon a hearing, recognized Moran to appear in the circuit court and answer to the charge thus preferred against him. Afterward the said Emily hied in the circuit court a paper, signed by her, stating that since the commencement of the action she had intermarried with the defendant, and that she thereby dismissed all further proceedings against him.
At the next term of court, the attorneys for the relatrix, for some reason not disclosed by the record, resisted a dismissal of the action, and the court refused to dismiss it.
The defendant then answered in two paragraphs :
1. In general denial.
2. That the defendant was the lawful husband of the relatrix, and that, in consequence, she was not entitled to prosecute the action against him.
A demurrer was sustained to the second paragraph of the answer, and, upon a trial of the cause, the defendant was adjudged to be the father of the child, of which the relatrix was then still pregnant, and ordered to pay the costs of the *209 prosecution, and to stand committed to the jail of the county until the costs were paid or replevied.
In the case of Doyle v. The State, 61 Ind. 324 , it was, upon full consideration, held that a child begotten before, but born after, the marriage of its parents, is not a bastard. To a charge of bastardy, therefore, where the child has not been born, it is a sufficient answer to set up the marriage of the defendant with the relatrix.
The second paragraph of the- answer might have been much improved by a motion to have it made more certain and specific, but it was substantially sufficient, and the court erred in sustaining a demurrer to it.
The judgment is reversed, at the costs of the relatrix, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.