TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Donaldson v. Board of Commissioners

Donaldson v. The Board of Commissioners of Wabash County

Donaldson v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 92 Ind. 80 (1883)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 27, 1883
Docket
No. 10,342
Judges
Elliott
Citations
92 Ind. 801883 Ind. LEXIS 437
Headnotes
County Treasurer. —Compensation. —Fees and Salaries. — No other or greater compensation can he allowed a county treasurer, under the fee and salary acts of 1875 and 1879, than therein specified. Acts 1875, Spec. Sess., p. 31; R. S. 1881, sections 5927 and 5928.
Summary
From the Wabash Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Elliott

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Elliott, J.

Appellant was treasurer of Wabash county from September, 1875, until September, 1879, and, by his complaint, claims compensation for services rendered, and for which, as he alleges, no compensation was specifically provided by law.

We dispose of the proposition that the treasurer was entitled to compensation for the-services sued for under the act of 1873, by pointing to the provisions of the act of 1875 by which the former act is declared, in unusually strong terms, to be repealed. Acts 1875, Spec. Sess., p. 50.

The fee and salary acts of 1875 and 1879 provide that the treasurer shall receive a designated salary, and, in addition, a certain per centum for collecting taxes, and a mileage for going to and returning from Indianapolis to make settlement with the State treasurer, and these provisions measure his compensation. There is nothing in the acts of 1875 or 1879 giving him compensation for any of the services mentioned in his complaint. Where a fixed salary is provided by law, and certain specified fees are designated, the officer can rightfully claim no other compensation. This would be so without any express provision of the statute, but in the acts referred to there are express prohibitions upon the allowance of any greater compensation than that specified. Acts 1875, sections 1 — 15; Acts 1879, p. 130,- sections 1,29,30, 39; Nowles v. Board, etc., 86 Ind. 179 .

Judgment affirmed.:

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1884–1885: 31886–1887: 11890–1891: 31892–1893: 11900–1901: 11916–1917: 118842026peak 1884 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Eley v. Miller34 N.E. 836 (Ind. Ct. App. 1893)
  2. Wright v. Board of Commissioners98 Ind. 88 (1884)
  3. Bynum v. Board of Commissioners100 Ind. 90 (1885)
  4. Board of Commissioners v. Barnes24 N.E. 137 (Ind. 1890)
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Harman101 Ind. 551 (1885)
  6. State ex rel. Holman v. Roach24 N.E. 106 (Ind. 1890)

Most recent

  1. Harter v. Board of Commissioners116 N.E. 304 (Ind. 1917)
  2. Lewis v. State ex rel. Harrison11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 647 (Oh. Circ. Ct. 1901)
  3. Eley v. Miller34 N.E. 836 (Ind. Ct. App. 1893)
  4. Board of Commissioners v. Johnson26 N.E. 821 (Ind. 1891)
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Barnes24 N.E. 137 (Ind. 1890)
  6. State ex rel. Holman v. Roach24 N.E. 106 (Ind. 1890)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nowles v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 86 Ind. 179 (1882) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list