United States v. Frank Grandlund
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank GRANDLUND, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Acting ex 'proprio motu and for the sole purpose of clarification of the directives contained in the opinion rendered herein on December 13,1995, and found at 71 F.3d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.1995), which directives were issued pursuant to this court’s supervisory powers, we act to remove any doubt about their application. The said directives are intended to apply only to future revocation hearings which the district court finds to be truly and legitimately contested. The directives have no application in any revocation hearing which does not involve a valid challenge to the laboratory test(s) or report(s).
Our opinion on the merits of the appeal is not affected in any way by this explication of the directives.
CLARIFICATION OF DIRECTIVES ISSUED.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(citing, inter alia, Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 786 (1973); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972))
Cited by 21 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.