Murphy v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Niblack, J.
Thomas Murphy, the appellant, was indicted for selling less than a quart of intoxicating liquor, without a license, to one Samuel Baldon, on the 19th day of October, 18184, and, in disregard of a motion to quash the indictment, was tried and convicted of the offence with which he was thus charged. The precise question involved in this appeal was considered and decided in the case of Murphy v. State, 106 Ind. 96 , and upon the authority of that case the judgment in this case can not be sustained.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to sustaip the motion to quash the indictment.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.