TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morse v. State

Morse v. State, 9 N.E. 455 (Ind. 1886)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 23, 1886
Docket
No. 13,503
Judges
Zollars
Citations
9 N.E. 455108 Ind. 5991886 Ind. LEXIS 286
Headnotes
'Criminal Law.— New Trial.—Newly Discovered Evidence.— A new trial should be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence where the latter shows a strong probability of innocence. '
Summary
From the Marion Criminal Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Zollars

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Zollars, J.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to ■one year’s imprisonment in the State prison, upon an indictment charging him and another with larceny in the taking *600 of a cornet horn, shown by the evidence to be worth less than five dollars.

Filed Dec. 23, 1886.

He based his motion for a new trial, ■ mainly, upon newly discovered evidence, which he could not have produced upon the trial.

We have examined carefully the evidence upon which he was convicted, as, also, the newly discovered evidence, as shown by his affidavit, and the affidavits of the persons whose testimony he seeks to avail himself of upon another trial, and without setting out either, we think it sufficient to say, that in our judgment a new trial ought to be awarded.

The new evidence, as set out in the affidavits, is important to appellant for the purpose of showing, that whatever he may have had to do with the horn, he had no intention of' stealing it, nor of assisting another in the commission of such offence.

It may be observed in passing, that the owner of the horn, as'shown by his affidavit, has become convinced since the trial, that appellant is not guilty of the crime for which he was convicted.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions; to the court below to sustain appellant’s motion for a new-trial.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11935: 11950: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gavalis v. State135 N.E. 147 (Ind. 1922)
  2. Yessen v. State92 N.E.2d 621 (Ind. 1950) · Dissent
  3. Morton v. State198 N.E. 307 (Ind. 1935)

Most recent

  1. Yessen v. State92 N.E.2d 621 (Ind. 1950) · Dissent
  2. Morton v. State198 N.E. 307 (Ind. 1935)
  3. Gavalis v. State135 N.E. 147 (Ind. 1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list