TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Monnett v. Hemphill

Monnett v. Hemphill, 11 N.E. 230 (Ind. 1887)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 5, 1887
Docket
No. 11,931
Judges
Elliott
Citations
11 N.E. 230110 Ind. 2991887 Ind. LEXIS 55
Headnotes
Appeal.—Satisfaction of Judgment Appealed from.—Dismissal.—Cost of Transcript.—Recovery.—Where, before an appeal is perfected, but after the transcript has been prepared, the judgment is entered as fully satisfied, no appeal will lie, and if taken it will be dismissed; but the expense incurred for the transcript may be recovered in an action for that purpose.
Summary
From the Jasper Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Elliott

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Elliott, C. J.

After the final judgment in this case, and •after the transcript of the record for appeal to this court had been prepared and certified, the appellees entered upon the order-book the following: “ The above judgment is hereby receipted in full, and no further proceedings will be taken under this order after this date.” This entry also appears: “ The petitioners in the above entitled cause, on this 1st day *300 of October, 1884, before this appeal is completed, and before the time for filing bills of exceptions expired, do hereby dismiss this whole proceeding, and authorize the clerk to receipt all judgments for costs and assessments against the said Elmira Monnett, and on this day pay all costs taxed to date.”

Filed April 5, 1887.

It thus appears that, prior to the time the appeal in this-case was taken, the appellant was fully relieved and released from the judgment against her, so that there is no longer any actual controversy between the parties. Under these circumstances we think it clear that no appeal will lie.

If liability had actually been incurred for the expense o.f preparing and certifying the transcript prior to the time the' judgment was entered satisfied, the appellant is entitled to. be reimbursed. In the proper proceeding she can doubtless recover from the appellees the amount paid, or agreed to be' paid, for the transcript; but, as the controversy has been ended by a satisfaction of the judgment, she can not maintain this appeal.

There is nothing in dispute except the judgment rendered against the appellant, and as that has been satisfied, there is. no actual controversy to be adjudicated.

The entry of satisfaction having been acted upon by the appellees, they are estopped to take any benefit from the judgment, even though there was no money consideration for the1 release. It settled a dispute in a pending litigation, and this is such a consideration as will effectually conclude the appellees from attempting to enforce the judgment directly or indirectly.

It is evident that there is but one course for us to pursue, and that is to dismiss the appeal. If we should affirm the judgment, we should adjudge the appellant bound to pay a. judgment that has been satisfied ; if, on the other hand, we should reverse, no substantial benefit would accrue to her,, for she is already relieved from the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1887: 11891: 21896: 11897: 11904: 11908: 11912: 11915: 21945: 11971: 118872026peak 1891 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ogborn v. City of Newcastle98 N.E. 869 (Ind. 1912)
  2. Princeton Coal & Mining Co. v. Gilmore83 N.E. 500 (Ind. 1908)
  3. Beard v. Hosier107 N.E. 558 (Ind. Ct. App. 1915)
  4. Adams Express Co. v. Welborn108 N.E. 163 (Ind. Ct. App. 1915)
  5. Signor v. Clark99 N.W. 68 (N.D. 1904)
  6. State ex rel. Robinson v. Boniecki61 N.E.2d 176 (Ind. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Pauline Moser, Administratrix of the Estate of George Moser, Deceased v. Francis Buskirk452 F.2d 147 (7th Cir. 1971)
  2. State ex rel. Robinson v. Boniecki61 N.E.2d 176 (Ind. 1945)
  3. Beard v. Hosier107 N.E. 558 (Ind. Ct. App. 1915)
  4. Adams Express Co. v. Welborn108 N.E. 163 (Ind. Ct. App. 1915)
  5. Ogborn v. City of Newcastle98 N.E. 869 (Ind. 1912)
  6. Princeton Coal & Mining Co. v. Gilmore83 N.E. 500 (Ind. 1908)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list