TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Denke-Walter v. Loeper

Denke-Walter v. Loeper, 42 N.E. 358 (Ind. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 10, 1895
Docket
No. 17,428
Judges
Monks
Citations
42 N.E. 358142 Ind. 6571895 Ind. LEXIS 222
Headnotes
Appellate Pbocedtjbe. — • Vacation Appeal.— Dismissal.— Parties Appellant. — A vacation appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, where all the joint judgment defendants in the trial court are not made co-appellants.
Summary
Erom the Marion Superior Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Monks

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Monks, J.

Ida M. Loeper, one of appellees, brought this action against her co-appellees and appellant to quiet title to real estate.

Cross-complaints were filed by certain of the appellees to quiet title to a part of the same real estate.

The cause was tried and judgment rendered quieting the title to said real estate, as prayed for in the complaint and in the cross-complaint. Judgment was also rendered against appellants, Mary O. Denke-Walter and Frederick W. Denke-Walter (who is made an appellee in this court) for costs.

It is settled law in this State that all joint-judgment defendants in the court below must be made co-appellants in this court in all vacation appeals or the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Acts 1895, p. 17 9 ; Elliott App. Proced., section 144; Inman v. Vogel, 141 Ind. 138 , and cases cited; Walsh v. Brockway, 13 Ind. App. 70 .

There can be but one appeal from the same judgment, and when the same is not a term time appeal all co-parties entitled to- appeal must be joined as co-appellants. Acts 1895, p. 179 ; Inman v. Vogel, supra; Gregory v. Smith, 139 Ind. 48 , and cases cited.

The appeal in this case was not a term time appeal and is not therefore governed hy the provisions of the acts approved March 9, 1895. Acts 1895, p. 179.

Frederick W. Denke-Walter was a co-party and joint-judgment defendant with appellant in the court below, and should have been made co-appellant in this court. This not having been done the appeal must be dismissed. Gregory v. Smith, supra; Inman v. Vogel, supra, and cases cited; Midland R. W. Co. v. St. Clair, 42 N. E. Rep. 214.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1896: 31897: 11900: 11901: 21902: 11912: 21915: 118962026peak 1896 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shuman v. Collis43 N.E. 257 (Ind. 1896)
  2. Hubbard v. Burnet-Lewis Lumber Co.98 N.E. 1011 (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  3. Continental Insurance v. Gue98 N.E. 147 (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  4. Lowe v. Turpie44 N.E. 25 (Ind. 1896)
  5. Smith v. Fairfield61 N.E. 560 (Ind. 1901)
  6. Stults v. Gibler45 N.E. 340 (Ind. 1896)

Most recent

  1. Shaw v. Garrett108 N.E. 536 (Ind. Ct. App. 1915)
  2. Hubbard v. Burnet-Lewis Lumber Co.98 N.E. 1011 (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  3. Continental Insurance v. Gue98 N.E. 147 (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  4. Brown v. Sullivan63 N.E. 302 (Ind. 1902)
  5. Smith v. Fairfield61 N.E. 560 (Ind. 1901)
  6. Everett v. Fouts60 N.E. 454 (Ind. Ct. App. 1901)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Inman v. Vogel, 40 N.E. 665 (Ind. 1895) 10
Gregory v. Smith, 38 N.E. 395 (Ind. 1894) 41
Walsh v. Brockway, 40 N.E. 29 (Ind. Ct. App. 1895) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list