TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.

James v. Lake Erie and Western Railway Co.

James v. Lake Erie & Western Ry. Co., 43 N.E. 876 (Ind. 1896)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 23, 1896
Docket
No. 17,829
Judges
Monks
Citations
43 N.E. 876144 Ind. 6301896 Ind. LEXIS 215
Headnotes
Appeal.—When Premature.—An appeal from the ruling of the trial court sustaining a demurrer, taken before entry of final judgment thereon, is premature.
Summary
From the Madison Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Monks

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Monks, J.

This is the second appeal of this cause. The first appeal was to the Appellate Court, where the judgment was reversed and the court below directed to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. Lake Erie, etc., R. R., Co. v. James, 10 Ind. App. 550 . On the return of the cause to the court below, the demurrer was sustained and appellant filed an amended complaint. Appellee demurred to the amended complaint for want of facts, which was sustained, to which ruling of the court appellant excepted. The only error assigned in this court calls in question the action of the court in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to the amended complaint.

Counsel for appellee insist that no question is presented by the record for the reason that it does not appear from the record that final judgment has been rendered in the cause.

An appeal only lies from judgments that make a disposition of a cause except as provided by statute. Thomas, Admr., v. Chicago, etc., R. W. Co., 139 Ind. *631 462 ; Champ v. Kendrick, 130 Ind. 545 ; Northcutt v. Buckles, 60 Ind. 577 .

Filed April 23, 1896.

The final entry of the proceedings of the court below is as follows: “Comes now the parties by counsel and the demurrer to the complaint is sustained by the court, to which ruling of the court the plaintiff (appellant) excepts and refuses to plead further, and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, which prayer the court grants.”

As no final judgment was rendered, the appeal was prematurely taken. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1905: 11907: 11908: 21911: 11916: 11930: 11933: 11970: 11975: 219052026peak 1908 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Tuf-Tread Corp. v. Kilborn172 N.E. 353 (Ind. 1930)
  2. State v. Collier331 N.E.2d 784 (Ind. Ct. App. 1975)
  3. Kurtz v. Phillips113 N.E. 1016 (Ind. Ct. App. 1916)
  4. Aocker v. Buell261 N.E.2d 894 (Ind. Ct. App. 1970)
  5. Taylor Washing Machine Co. v. Lamere185 N.E. 660 (Ind. Ct. App. 1933)
  6. Neyens v. Flesher79 N.E. 1087 (Ind. Ct. App. 1907)

Most recent

  1. State v. Collier331 N.E.2d 784 (Ind. Ct. App. 1975)
  2. State v. Blatt331 N.E.2d 784 (Ind. Ct. App. 1975)
  3. Aocker v. Buell261 N.E.2d 894 (Ind. Ct. App. 1970)
  4. Taylor Washing Machine Co. v. Lamere185 N.E. 660 (Ind. Ct. App. 1933)
  5. Tuf-Tread Corp. v. Kilborn172 N.E. 353 (Ind. 1930)
  6. Kurtz v. Phillips113 N.E. 1016 (Ind. Ct. App. 1916)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Champ v. Kendrick, 30 N.E. 635 (Ind. 1892) 30
Northcutt v. Buckles, 60 Ind. 577 (1877) 26
Thomas v. Chicago & Erie Ry. Co., 39 N.E. 44 (Ind. 1894) 19
Lake Erie & Western R.R. v. James, 35 N.E. 395 (Ind. Ct. App. 1893) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list