Erganbright v. State
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Monks, J.
Appellant was charged by indictment with the crime of embezzlement under the provisions of section 2031, Burns’ E. S. 1891 (Acts 1891, p. 395).
Appellant moved to quash each count of the indictment, which motion was overruled. Appellant filed a special plea in bar, to which appellee demurred for want of facts, which demurrer was sustained by the court. The cause was continued and is still pending in the court below.
This appeal is taken from the decision of the court below overruling.the motion to quash, and in sustaining the. demurrer to the plea in bar.
It is settled law that appeals in criminal cases can only be taken from final judgments. Farrel v. State, 7 Ind. 345 ; Miller v. State, 8 Ind. 325 ; Wingo v. State, 99 Ind. 313 : State v. Evansville, etc., R. R. Co., 107 Ind. 581 .
No final judgment having been rendered in said cause, this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.