Nelson v. State, ex rel. Martin
Nelson, Trustee v. State, ex rel. Martin
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Gillett, J.
This was a proceeding by way of mandate against the trustee of West Point school township, in White county. The alternative writ commanded him to. furnish school facilities to relators’ children of school age. A demurrer to the writ was overruled, and an exception reserved. This ruling is assigned as error.
*492
1. 2. It appears from the petition that the schoolhouse where relators’ children attended school during previous years was destroyed by fire and not rebuilt, and that for a number of years thereafter such children were furnished a conveyance by appellant in going to and from another school, but that this practice was after-wards discontinued. So far as appears from the petition (and as is affirmatively shown in the return), the school which such children formerly attended was legally abandoned. It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the precise relief which relators seek-—whether it is to have their children transported to and from school, or to have a school established in the vicinity of their homes. We have but recently held that the trustee cannot, under the law as it existed when this action was brought, be compelled by mandate to furnish a conveyance. State, ex rel., v. Jackson (1907), ante, 384. If the establishment of a new school district is what is sought, it is enough to say that the matter complained of is of an administrative character, and, before resorting to the courts, relators should have sought a remedy, after the adverse decision of appellant, through the due course of appeal to the higher school authorities. §§6028, 6029 Burns 1901, §4537, 4538 R. S. 1881; State, ex rel., v. Seely (1904), 163 Ind. 244 ; Advisory Board, etc., v. State, ex rel. (1905), 164 Ind. 295 ; State, ex rel., v. Black (1906), 166 Ind. 138 .
3. We may add that under the act of March 11, 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 444), relators will doubtless find a sufficient remedy for their grievance.
Judgment reversed, with a direction to sustain the demurrer to the alternative writ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.